• Garbanzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    There must have been a tragic and bizarre set of circumstances to lead to this. The IDF has assured us that they’re taking great measures to avoid civilian casualties, and their actions are fully legal and justified. Those hostages must have escaped and taken up arms and attacked the Israeli soldiers by mistake, because otherwise they couldn’t possibly have been mistaken for combatants. I’m just flabbergasted, no one could have foreseen something like this happening. It’s really shocking.

    • rivermonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      84
      ·
      11 months ago

      Which actually is true. You should spend your time condemning the terrorist elected government of Gaza, Hamas needs to be eradicated.

      • cerement@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        how dare the prisoners of a concentration camp strike back at their guards! for shame!

        • fluxion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          As much as I disagree with the comment you’re responding to, this is such a bullshit characterization of Hamas’ initial and grotesque slaughter of random Israeli civilians. That behavior is never justified.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            So a distinction needs to be made here:

            Hamas soldiers committed a number of unforgiveable atrocities on October 7th. That said, the attack itself was against military targets for clear military and political goals, and until we get evidence to the contrary didn’t include orders to intentionally kill civilians. Again, not defending anyone who committed atrocities during or after the attack, but the idea that the 1200 were all mercilessly killed by Hamas is Israeli propaganda. 30% were IDF personnel, and out of the other 70% some died to reckless IDF fire (remember the helicopter that opened fire on the festival?), some died in the crossfire, and some were actually killed by the IDF to take out Hamas soldier who were taking them hostage.

            That is to say, October 7th wasn’t simply grotesque slaughter of random Israeli civilians, and we don’t have evidence Hamas leadership gave any orders for that.

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Your apology for terrorists and war crimes of the elected government of Gaza says everything.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, I’m not going to disagree with the condemnation of the terrorist attack. That said, Israel has been, objectively, committing war crimes for decades now unpunished.

            Two wrongs don’t make a right, not justifying just explaining, and all that.

            • rivermonster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Before Oct. all the apartheid collective punishment was absolutely war crimes, and I’d love to see Bibi and many Likud members at the ICC for their crimes. They can still argue that Gaza was an operational location for Hamas, but I think and hope they’d lose that argument.

              But after October… Hamas officially made Gaza a theater of war and any target they co-locate in loses legal protections. And when I see 57% resident support for Hamas there (their elected governement), I steuggle and mostly feel awful for the 43% who don’t support them.

              I am with you that two wrongs don’t make a right. Or in this region’s case, an endless cycle of thousands of years of violence don’t make a right.

              But I also believe strongly that Israel has a right to defend itself. The current mess is Hamas’s design. I don’t know what people want Israel to do, take the terrorist attack that killed 1200+… just take it on the chin and go “oh well”? When any honest person knows no nation on earth would do that.

              Take my upvote, a rare one on the worldnews group.

              • sknowmads@dormi.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Fully agree Israel has a right to defend itself but what it seems to be doing now is more akin to invasive eradication than defense. They are on the offensive. Why does 1.2K dead in Israel justify 18K dead, hospitals targeted and destroyed, and a forced emigration of citizens in Gaza?

                If a terrorist organization ruled the US I’m sure more than half the country would vote in support either out of blind nationalism or fear. Putin’s got >90% support, eh? I don’t think it’s fair to say any recent election in Gaza is unbiased. It would also seem not so unreasonable that to the people of Gaza, Hamas looks more friendly than Israel recently.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Take my upvote, a rare one on the worldnews group.

                After reading past your first paragraph, I’m not sure I want it from you.

                Hamas is a reaction to the mess, not its “designer.”

          • cerement@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            your apology for terrorists and war crimes and settler colonialism and genocide by the elected government of Israel says everything

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why are 18k people “collateral damage” but those three are “a tragedy”? Please explain.

      • machinin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Eliminate Likud and the IDF while we’re at it. Eliminate all terrorists from the area.

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m with you, I hate the Likud party, and Hamas is the reason Bibi and them are in power. If you don’t understand that, just do a little historical research.

          And blanket stating that the IDF is terrorists is ridiculous. I know it’s hip and trendy right now to say, but that doesn’t make it true.

          • machinin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            At this point, what is the difference between Hamas and the IDF? The only difference is the amount of weapons and money behind the 2 groups.

            It’s not just the hip thing to say. The IDF is a genocidal tool of the Israeli state terrorizing the Palestinian people.

            • rivermonster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              The difference is Hamas ALWAYS has and openly targets civilians. The IDF is trying to minimize them in one of the densest urban war theaters ever (chosen by and forced by Hamas who is co-locating and using it as a shield).

              You don’t seem to understand the civilian casualties that would occur if the IDF were intentionally seeking to target civilians. You’d be looking at hundreds of thousands or even millions. And you would NOT risk your troops on the ground with that plan. They have the ability to end this with no troops on the ground, but not while minimizing casualties.

              • machinin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m sure the 18,000+ dead civilians appreciate the fact that they weren’t openly trying to be killed. I’m sure the thousands of civilians in detention without charges are also glad to hear that the IDF isn’t doing all this out in the open.

                Israel is a genocidal state terrorizing the Palestinian people. It must be broken.

                • rivermonster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You diminish the term genocide when you misuse it. And yes, Hamas murdering 18,000 civilians by using them as shields and intentionally trying to force as many civilian casualties as possible is horrific. It’s part of why I support hunting them all down and killing them.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I think you have it backwards. Bibi is the reason Hamas is in power.

            Maybe there’s some truth to it the way you said it, but this is literally objective reality. He directly supported Hamas.

            • rivermonster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              There wouldn’t even be a Bibi without them. He would have lost, and Perez would have moved forward with two states and Arafat (who Hamas would have also had a harder time removing).

              The bottom line is I think we can agree they’re bedfellows, yeah? Hamas has been trying to make this conflict happen their entire existence. They want maximum Palestian casualties in the hopes of expanding the war to more nations than just their allies like Quatar, Iran, and the Houthis.

              Never look to me to defend Bibi and the Likud. Many war criminals there I’d like to see taken to the Hague.

              • cerement@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Hamas has been trying to make this conflict happen their entire existence

                Hamas wouldn’t exist without the atrocities of Israel and the IOF – Hamas was created afterwards (long afterwards)

      • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You mean the tyrannical pseudo-government that does not allow dissent? The one whose majority of citizens not only did not vote, but never had the opportunity to vote?

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean the officially elected one that’s still the governing power there. Just bc that’s inconvenient to a false narrative doesn’t change it.

          • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, you purport to give legitimacy to a government that has none. Looking at some of your other comments here, it is obvious that you are creating a false narrative to criminalize civilians and justify war crimes.

            I don’t think you’re going to fool anyone with more than one brain cell with your zionist propaganda, but that’s your problem.

            • rivermonster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Hamas uses civilians as shields. And I condem co-locating in protected targets, causing them to lose thar legal protected status–those ARE war crimes. Period. I absolutely condemn all the intentional civilian casualties Hamas has caused and seeks to maximize.

              But also, your antisemitism is showing.

              • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You are back to justifying Israel’s war crimes and blaming others for them, the 101 from the good zionist’s handbook.

                On the other hand, while accusing those who criticize israel’s actions of anti-semitism is another classic, doing it against someone who has only criticized hamas is very novel on your part, good job.

      • shiroininja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why can’t both be wrong? Neither deserves the land. I’m at the point where I’m starting to think everyone should be removed from the area of Israel and Gaza, etc. and it be declared a world heritage site with a visitor center and museum by each of the three Abrahamic religions/cultures and nobody allowed to actually live there. Everyone gets their holy land visitation and nobody owns it. The states there were artificially created, and they can be removed

        • cerement@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          three Abrahamic religions

          so nothing for Yezidis, Zoroastrians, or any other pre-Abrahamic religions?

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          That would be cool, but who would administer this site, the UN? And I imagine there would be attacks on the site from both (if not three, if you include crazy Evangelicals) sides trying to reclaim it.

          As long as these Abrahamic religions are around, people will be fighting over that land so it seems. Truly a benevolent and merciful god.

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d go for a world ban on religion altogether! It’s definitely a core pillar of the problem. The land is stupid… all of it. 100% agree.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Always remember that when this person says Hamas, they mean everyone, like the Minister of Education, the telecommunication company, or that teenage girl volunteering at her government-run school.

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          Inconvenient facts are definitely unpalatable to the fake narrative spread by Hamas agents and supporters here.

      • Cpo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah attacking refugee camps, hospitals and private residences will ensure peace for sure.

        /s

        The number of future terrorists will only increase in numbers because people will have destroyed homes and murdered innocent brothers and fathers to avenge.

        FYI: Most people there just make due with what they have and do not even support Hamas.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          The number of future terrorists will only increase in numbers because people will have destroyed homes and murdered innocent brothers and fathers to avenge.

          Which is exactly why Bibi funded Hamas. Nationalism is a cancer, no matter where it is.

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          Co-locating in them and stripping them legally of protected status should never be tolerated, it’s good that Hamas is being executed 24/7.

          I’m glad that every dead Hamas monster makes the Palestinians safer. Let’s hope we can get rid of them swiftly so that there are no further compromising of what would otherwise be protected targets.

          • theluckyone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Three Israeli hostages get killed by IDF forces, that’s a tragedy. Two civilians in Gaza get killed by IDF forces for every Hamas fighter killed? “Regrettable but tremendously positive.”

            Having no Hamas present never protected the West Bank from Israeli.

            Hamas, the Israeli government, and the IDF are all murderers.

            • rivermonster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              I keep trying to explain, judging conflicts based on whether casualties are even, is morally and ethically bankrupt. It’s a really sick way of thinking.

              The corollary is this would be more acceptable if more of the other side died. I mean, that’s seriously broken.

              • theluckyone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Don’t put words in my mouth.

                Israeli says three deaths of their hostages is a tragedy, while thousands of Gaza civilians dying is “tremendously positive.”

                I’m pointing out their rampant hypocrisy and blatant disregard for their fellow man… If you believe the same, you’re just as morally and ethically bankrupt.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        What about the other potentially tens of thousands “mistakenly” killed civilians or are we pretending that only those three were mistaken?

        • rivermonster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think wanting proportional casualties is a really horrible way to evaluate a conflict. I hear that you desire more deaths so that it’s evened out and cringe, that’s so sick man.

      • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I see no difference between Hamas and Israel, so you can go on and eradicate both if that’s your solution.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Israel’s global narrative be like:

    ✅ Collateral damage:

    - most hospitals non-functional

    - 18,000+ dead

    - bakeries can’t make food

    - infants dead in incubators

    - patients forced to “evacuate” under gunfire

    - dying of preventable diseases

    - 10k people missing/dead and still under rubble

    - hundreds held and stripped, others detained in an “unknown location”

    - journalists, UN workers, doctors dead while on duty or while sheltering with their families


    😥 Tragedy:

    - 3 Israeli hostages killed “by mistake” despite having civilian clothes on and being unarmed


    Disclaimer: yes, of course, it’s a tragedy, but also proof that the IDF targets anything that moves.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Basically they killed them because they shot at any civilians.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do love how quickly that episode has been memed.

      And the dance number. Got to love a villain that’s having fun with it.

      Well, a fictional villain that has fun with their villainy. The real world examples are much less fun.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    An initial IDF probe into the hostage killing incident suggests all three men were shirtless, with one carrying a makeshift white flag.

    On seeing them, one Israeli soldier shouted “terrorists!” to the other forces, initiating fire at the men, according to reports.

    While two hostages were hit immediately and fell to the ground, the third managed to escape into a nearby building where despite pleas in Hebrew, he was also shot and killed, a military official said.

    So what happened we do our outmost to protect civilian lives? Because believing that this is the first time something like this to happen in Gaza is rather naïve.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    It happens. I guess it’s good they admitted it instead of just saying Hamas killed them? If only in the thousands of years humans have been alive we could found a way to resolve conflict without killing.

    • theluckyone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      It reveals their character. Kill a few hostages by mistake? That’s a tragedy. Kill two civilians in Gaza per Hamas fighter? Regrettable, but “tremendously positive.”

      Hamas, the Israeli government, and the IDF are three sides of the same die: murderers with no respect for their fellow human.

  • dukatos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago
    • IDF shot unarmed civilians waving white flag
    • target was unarmed and not returning fire yet IDF killed just 2 of 3 at first try
    • IDF was scared
    • IDF didn’t follow orders

    Great army /s

    • ???@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Previously another 3 hostages were “found dead” and I’m now really wondering if they killed those too

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Israeli military has said that its troops shot and killed three hostages being held by Hamas after mistakenly identifying them as a threat during fighting in a battle-torn neighbourhood of Gaza City.

    The announcement on Friday came amid heavy fighting across the embattled territory that led to an influx of dead and wounded into hospitals in Deir al-Balah, Khan Younis and Rafah.

    Al Jazeera initially said that video journalist Samer Abu Daqqa and its chief correspondent in Gaza, Wael al-Dahdouh, had been injured by shrapnel when they were reporting at a school that had been hit by an earlier airstrike.

    Earlier on Friday, the IDF recovered the bodies of three other hostages in Gaza: Elya Toledano, 28, a French-Israeli civilian, and two soldiers, Nik Beizer and Ron Scherman, both 19.

    Families of the hostages said this week they were “shocked” by the announcement by the director of Israeli intelligence agency the Mossad that he was refusing to conduct new negotiations to free them, and demanded an explanation from the authorities.

    A resident of Tel Aviv, he was at the Nova music festival along with his friend and fellow French-Israeli Mia Schem, who was released under a truce agreement at the end of November.


    The original article contains 829 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • rivermonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    We should be furious with Hamas for using them as shields. Though again, Hamas has majority support amongst residents in Gaza, so…

    Fighting in dense urban conditions like this, 18k is definitely an attempt to minimize civilian casualties. If they were intentionally causing them, they wouldn’t go in at all. They’d just kill magnitudes more (hundreds of thousands or millions) without risking soldiers. They easily have the firepower to do it.

    We should all condemn their elected terrorists for forcing the theater to be amongst civilians. It’s a war crime, co-location strip protections, and legitimized targeting places that would otherwise be protected by international law.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ohhhh, furious with Hamas or with the IDF, who killed 3 shirtless people waving a white flag? Are you living in a parallel reality or are you so brainwashed?

      • rivermonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        In an environment where that’s the standard tactic of Hamas, hide behind civilians, yeah, I understand the friendly fire. This is Hamas. They blew up their own hospital, hoping ppl like worldnews would blame Israel for it… and they did.

        If you think that while hiding amongst civilians or while keeping hostages they aren’t trained to try and appear like innocents, then I don’t know how to help you. It’s literally their main tactic.

          • rivermonster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I too would resort to name calling with a factually bankrupt argument and poor reasoning skills. Well done!

            • filister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Poor reasoning skills? Sorry but even IDF admitted their fuck-up and said that it was against their rules of disengagement, while you still pretend that they did nothing wrong. So who’s morally bankrupt here? You who is refusing to admit the wrongdoings of your own people even when presented with clear undisputed facts or me?

              • rivermonster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                They admit wrongdoing because they’re not intentionally targeting civilians.

                To support your false narrative/pro-hamas propaganda, you’re attempting to conflate an accident during wartime as intentionally targeting civilians. It’s really not okay, and I am concerned for you.

                You don’t know who “my people” are, but I see the attempt to start framing more personal attacks, and intent to libel further, and I get that you’ve embarrassed yourself multiple times and shown your true colors. You have my pity.