

I’ve heard of that, and I actually hope it’s true. I’m going on E next month, and I had trouble crying actual tears since I had my masc puberty. Would be so liberating to actually let out some tears every once in a while :'>
she/her


I’ve heard of that, and I actually hope it’s true. I’m going on E next month, and I had trouble crying actual tears since I had my masc puberty. Would be so liberating to actually let out some tears every once in a while :'>


Always love to spot Heaven Will Be Mine in the wild


I was joking, take the tidy skittles in responsible doses!


Well, have you tried?


↑ Good girl spotted ↑


Good girls, the both of you :3
Wall of force lasts 10 minutes, just saying
It got buffed to a d6 in 5.5e
But then again, with this math they’re talking about 5e, so your point stands
That sounds similar in purpose to Haskell’s ‘Maybe’ or Rust’s ‘Option’ enum, right?
I still think that the null type was a mistake that introduces unnecessary bugs. But I’m glad to see more languages are taking measures against it
Dnd 3.5 has a lot, like 80%, rules overlap with pf1e. Pathfinder was a fork of the game system, basically


Same, and I haven’t even started voice training yet

That is not true, and never has been. The dichotomy described by bi in bisexual isn’t male/female, it’s homo/heterosexual. Pansexual is a subcategory of bisexual, emphasizing that one is attracted to all genders (or regardless of gender), not just a subset of them, equally. Whereas a bisexual might have varying levels of attentions to different genders
13.1% if BI is a d6, or 20.7% if they’re past level 5 and it’s a d8. Certainly doable


Poison the monk
That’s Pathfinder rules, this is 5e
formally there is no crit success in 5e