• Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      141·
      9 hours ago

      This is the third time now I’ve removed one of your comments for this kind of gatekeeping of other peoples identity. You’re no longer welcome in blahaj zone communities

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.netEnglish
      8·
      10 hours ago

      Gender is a social construct, and if your friend wants a new gender and you won’t help them socially construct it, you’re a bad friend.

    • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPEnglish
      4·
      8 hours ago

      How does this not have any downvotes except mine

      this is blahaj zone how did transphobia (which the mods then removed) end up with 38 upvotes and 0 downvotes

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.netEnglish
      9·
      12 hours ago

      To some extent, I agree. However, making up new words and terms can be the beginning of the “social” part of the social construct. For instance, part of why I’m so attached to “bisexual” as a label rather than terms like pansexual is that learning of bisexuality was the first time I realised that it was possible to be attracted to more than one gender; previously, I had thought that because I had experienced attraction to boys, that I must be straight. This led me to not even notice the attraction I felt towards other girls until I learned that bisexuality was a thing

      • MaybeNaught@lemmy.world
        9·
        14 hours ago

        It’s the localized update of a localized update of a localized update of a localized update to a social construct.

    • yellow [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      24·
      20 hours ago

      Reminds me of a quote from Nevada by Imogen Binnie:

      “Yes, gender is a social construct, but so are traffic lights, and if you ignore those, you get run over by a car. Which is also a social construct.”

      (Recited from memory, probably not word-for-word accurate.)

      • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
        10·
        16 hours ago

        Oh, that quote is good. Except the last sentence. If everybody would stop believing in cars, they would still exist.

        • Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          3·
          2 hours ago

          Those objects would still exist, but they wouldn’t be recognized as manifestations of the same category “car”. And they are quite different from each other, just look at electric vs gas, and vs motorcycles which somehow aren’t cars.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          3·
          9 hours ago

          Cars don’t randomly start up and drive themselves yet. If everyone were to stop believing in cars, they’d just become mythical objects that litter the world but are of no one’s concern.