The Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense claims that pro-Ukrainian hacktivists breached the Russian Center for Space Hydrometeorology, aka “planeta” (планета), and wiped 2 petabytes of data.

  • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
    1166·
    1 year ago

    One side of me wants to cheer the Ukrainians, but the other laments that they… “hurt science”. I wish they could have stolen the data before they wiped it so it wasn’t lost, but that’s a lot of data to swipe.

    I get it, it’s just I’m sad all of that knowledge was lost. Space Hydrometeorology isn’t really relevant to war-waging. It wasn’t a strategic target.

    I will drink two toasts tonight: one for Ukraine’s victory, and one to lament lost knowledge.

    • GONADS125@feddit.deEnglish
      403·
      1 year ago

      I agree with you completely. Any time knowledge like this is destroyed, it illicits the same feeling for me as thinking about the destruction of the Library of Alexandria.

      Fuck russia, but also fuck destroying knowledge in the name of war…

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        but also fuck destroying knowledge in the name of war…

        That’s why War sucks, and Humanity should never fight them.

    • Teanut@lemmy.worldEnglish
      27·
      1 year ago

      Weather forecasting is actually really important for military operations. Consider weather advisories for aircraft, for example. Or planning an offensive on a clear day.

      That said I don’t know if this place was doing climate science or weather forecasting (or both).

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.worldEnglish
      171·
      1 year ago

      I wish they could have stolen the data before they wiped it so it wasn’t lost, but that’s a lot of data to swipe.

      Ukrainian hackers could cryptolocker it and exchange the keys for Ukrainian POWs.

    • Sprokes@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      1 year ago

      I am sure they have offline backups. Also sometimes most of the data is garbage in the sense we collect anything in case we need it.

    • Exosus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they’ve downloaded the data to their 2 petabyte pen drive first

      • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        striking a vulnerable Russian target was political.

        Nothing like “science progresses us” more like “this data hurts people”

        these are not the same. and, these Ukrainian hackers probably were more badass techies than trains on discriminate strategic targeting, so they hit whatever had the weakest security. like, I get it, but if someone sat them aside for five minutes and explained that this data is valuable to humanity, and should, at least, be preserved, they would have thought twice before deleting it without preserving it— or, at least making sure the Russians had backups. (maybe they do?)

        also, as I mentioned, this action is only sorta embarrassing, not statically useful. it’s not military or strategic/spy data they deleted. this cyberattack doesn’t damage any infrastructure or anything related to war-making. it was an indiscriminate attack based, certainly, on opportunity, not static planning.

        given Ukraines recent… budget issues, I think that their innovation in drone attacks in one front they should continue to invest in both because its cheap, but also minimizes casualties. the other they should now explore is cyberwarfare. And cyberattacks should be strategic in nature. They should disable, immobilize, and/or destroy a target. Destroying priceless knowledge is just wrong and benefits nobody.

  • derpgon@programming.devEnglish
    5311·
    1 year ago

    I see all the comments saying Ukraine targeted non-military entity. But IMO, Russia can get fucked. I am not sure if they shared the data with anyone, or kept it to themselves, but no loss.

      • cheesebag@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        The Russian Federation actually does give a fuck about climate… They want to make global warming worse. They get to sell more gas, they get more arable land up north, and they open up shipping routes in the Arctic. Putin is Captain Planet levels of evil, fr.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.eeEnglish
      112·
      1 year ago

      This has “they deserved it” energy.

    • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
      116·
      1 year ago

      Following that logic, civilians should be fair game because “Russia can get fucked”.

      • amorpheus@lemmy.worldEnglish
        215·
        1 year ago

        Ukrainian civilians are fair game to the Russian military, so…

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.worldEnglish
        163·
        1 year ago

        I love how we’re equating loss of data to loss of human life.

        • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
          22·
          1 year ago

          Taking a “this is justified because fuck Russia” line of logic to its logical conclusion is not the same as equating data loss to loss of human life.

    • maness300@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1623·
      1 year ago

      I disagree wholeheartedly with the idea of collective punishment.

      It’s very easy to turn collective punishment into discrimination and genocide. This solves nothing and only creates more problems.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7·
        1 year ago

        I agree but this seems to be an attack on a military contractor, similar to if Russia attacked Lockheed martin. Sure Lockheed does civilian stuff but they actively help the military. I am not sure what the UN says about it, and it certainly isn’t the same as Israel collectively punishing Gaza.

        I suppose everything has nuance

      • derpgon@programming.devEnglish
        136·
        1 year ago

        When the people accept this kind of behavior (of Putler), then they can’t have it nice, either.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.caEnglish
        95·
        1 year ago

        I’m sorry, are you saying that genocide (which is what Russia literally is doing in Ukraine)is bad? Because again, that is literally what Russia is doing in Ukraine.

        This is a target because it’s information can be (fuck that, IS) important and be used in the Russian invasion efforts. It’s a legit target

      • okamiueru@lemmy.worldEnglish
        34·
        1 year ago

        This has got to be the most peculiar downvoted comment I’ve seen on lemmy so far. A principled disagreement with collective punishment? Weird.

        Edit: what am I missing? Or have I stumbled into a part of lemmy that is totally fine with stuff Nazi Germany did, and present day Israel and Russia are doing?

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.eeEnglish
    341·
    1 year ago

    They’d be morons if they didn’t back up important data off site.

    • nomad@infosec.pubEnglish
      35·
      1 year ago

      Have you ever seen any academic IT systems? They are all underfunded ans run by grad students.

      • cynar@lemmy.worldEnglish
        12·
        1 year ago

        Even worse, they are often a case of accretion by generations of grad students and undergrads.

        E.g. a university was redoing how it hosted student club websites. When it eventually killed the old hosting, 1 site stayed working. It was eventually tracked down to a little mini pc mounted above the false ceiling. It had been plodding away for 20 odd years, most of that without any maintenance at all.

      • 50gp@kbin.social
        6·
        1 year ago

        and here we have underfunded science with lots of russian corruption on top

        real chance of backup system money disappearing in pockets…

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.eeEnglish
        41·
        1 year ago

        You’re insulting grad students. ;) But yea, I imagine it is very underfunded!

  • dlpkl@lemmy.worldEnglish
    201·
    1 year ago

    The only reasonable excuse for attacking this data was that it helped the Russian war effort. Eg. flying in supplies, planning offensives, missile and UAV flight planning, etc.

  • Quokka@quokk.auEnglish
    237·
    1 year ago

    Planeta is a state research center using space satellite data and ground sources like radars and stations to provide information and accurate predictions about weather, climate, natural disasters, extreme phenomena, and volcanic monitoring.

    That’s just fucking stupid of them.

    This massive volume of information would be difficult and costly to store in backups, so if Ukraine’s claims are true, this is a catastrophic attack on Planeta.

    A 45tb tape would cost me a consumer $98, 45 of them would be 2pb and cost a whopping $4,320, it would surely be even cheaper for a bulk order at non-consumer costs. Hardly difficult or costly.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
      173·
      1 year ago

      A 45tb tape would cost me a consumer $98, 45 of them would be 2pb and cost a whopping $4,320, it would surely be even cheaper for a bulk order at non-consumer costs. Hardly difficult or costly.

      it’s not just the cost of the tape (or whatever storage medium). it’s the cost of maintaining a secure off-site backup system. surely, you understand this, and how one is much more expensive than the other, especially at scale.

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        13·
        1 year ago

        2pb is nothing if we’re talking about a small datacenter backed up by the government. That said, Russia has a history of special kind of dumbassery

        • Moonrise2473@feddit.itEnglish
          21·
          1 year ago

          I think the main problem is that if, for example, they got 1 million allocated in the budget for maintaining the server farm, after corruption and shit only 250k would be actually available

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s the start of dumbassery. Next comes cutting corners

      • Quokka@quokk.auEnglish
        22·
        1 year ago

        Would they maintain their own private off-site backup or would they be in a cluster with other government agencies or renting out from a commercial operation?

        The cost would be massive for you or I to utilise such services, less so for an agency, and it certainly isn’t difficult.

        I understand science is generally always under funded and there’s probably some oligarch skimming off of their budget, but I still don’t see this being the win they think it is in any form. I can only hope the climate data is not lost to all time.

        • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
          31·
          1 year ago

          Would they maintain their own private off-site backup or would they be in a cluster with other government agencies or renting out from a commercial operation?

          nobody said they would. I’m just pointing out that the difficulty of backing up 45TB+ of computational meteorological data is a greater consideration than a bulk purchase of magnetic tape.

          and, really, the carelessness with which you regard research and knowledge is pretty disgusting. don’t think you’re some hero for that. that’s hundreds of millions - possibly billions - of dollars of research and work let and hundreds of thousands of man-hours just gone. and, again, the data, the analysis, and the knowledge. just gone.

          • Quokka@quokk.auEnglish
            12·
            1 year ago

            What are you on about?

            Like 95% of what you’ve just ranted about doesn’t even relate to my posts.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.itEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      Technically with 45tb they mean “45tb of highly compressible text”, actually is 18tb.

      And raw images aren’t compressible

      With a catch like this the genius marketing could call them “100 petabyte tapes” (only if you store zero-filled files)

      So it needs more tapes and the drive itself is also very expensive, around $10k, and it’s not something that a Russian government entity can access easily today, but needs to be bought from grey market resellers with higher markup.

      Then needs a dedicated server for that, a person (or a robotic arm) that changes the tapes every few hours, temperature controlled off-site storage…

    • Hooverx@lemm.eeEnglish
      12·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but that makes the propaganda sound bad.

      (you also need the tape read/write machine and a storage system, but those aren’t that expensive either).

    • helmet91@lemmy.worldEnglish
      211·
      1 year ago

      1000 Terabytes (TB) = 1 Petabyte (PB).

      Or: 1024 Tebibytes (TiB) = 1 Pebibyte (PiB)

      Or: 1024 Terabytes (TB) = 1.024 Petabytes (PB)

      Or: 1024 Terabytes (TB) = 1 Petabyte (TB), 24 Terabytes (TB)

      But: 1024 Terabytes (TB) != 1 Petabyte (PB)

  • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
    916·
    1 year ago

    Hell yeah, score another point for the anti-science team!

    • Hubi@feddit.deEnglish
      121·
      1 year ago

      Erasing data that is used for military reconnaissance in a hostile country is not a crime.

      • guh65@futurology.todayEnglish
        28·
        1 year ago

        Let me guess, would you approve ukraine burning libraries in russia? It is a hostile country where every single russian is hostile, after all. Libraries are a source of knowledge and knowledge can be used for war. Even educational institutions need to be shut down as they aid in research for war related purposes.

        • Hubi@feddit.deEnglish
          12·
          1 year ago

          If they set up a military installation inside a library with the purpose of harming Ukraine, then yes. Aside from that, this is a ridiculous comparison.

    • Dicska@lemmy.worldEnglish
      62·
      1 year ago

      Manslaughter is a crime. How would you defend your country when the enemy is killing your people?

      • guh65@futurology.todayEnglish
        17·
        1 year ago

        If ukraine hacks and deletes nasa’s servers would you still defend ukraine or label people calling out the perpetrators as nationalists? Replace russia with america and your perspective changes dramatically.

        • Dicska@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          1 year ago

          Sure I wouldn’t. I’m quite thankful they hacked Russia instead.

  • Paragone@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1631·
    1 year ago

    That was a non-military target.

    That also harmed science.

    That kind of targetting is what I expect of Russia, but if Ukranians are doing it to, then it means they’re losing their ability to discern who the proper targets are, vs who the not proper targets are, and are assaulting more indiscriminately.

    Not wise, Ukraina, sorry.

    _ /\ _

    • Squizzy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      15·
      1 year ago

      They’re authoritarian war mongers using chemical warfare to assassinate people on foreign soil. They are illegally occupying a country, and this target was supplying the war effort with information. Fuck anything Russia at this point.

    • cartoon meme dog@lemm.eeEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      being “science” doesn’t make make it harmless.

      good meteorology supports military operations.

      if it hurts russia’s accuracy in predicting weather, it helps Ukraine’s chance for surviving this war.

      nobody says this particular action was a top priority, but every little resistance against the russian genocide helps.

    • Hubi@feddit.deEnglish
      10·
      1 year ago

      The heavy water plant the Germans set up in WW2 was also “science” and it’s still a good thing that it was sabotaged.

    • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.worldEnglish
      69·
      1 year ago

      The civilian script kiddies did that or the Ukrainian government? In both cases…yeah, they are being kinda moronic and harmful by destroying research.