• rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Headline should read, “American allies worry the US is growing less dependable, because of Republican House insurrectionists”

    • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, the headline correctly expresses the sentiments of foreign leaders about american stability, regardless of the outcome of our elections.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you think that’s the only foreign policy issue America has, you might be wasting your money on that subscription to “The Atlantic”

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      You think they can count on Geriatric Joe? Even if Trump doesn’t win the American government is a ship without a captain.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    To be fair, a multipolar world is fine. It’s not in our, or anyone else’s really, interests to try to dictate to other overseas peoples how they should structure their lives and governments. We did give it a shot, make no mistake, but it doesn’t tend to work out all that well.

    We have no ability to stop the rise of places like China and India though, so fine, rise. We’ll only run into problems if this whole “spheres of influence” thing makes them think they can attack someone we have a security treaty with. That would be a problem.

    You want to use economic or social power instead of military power though? Try to convince people instead of force them at gunpoint? Fine. No big deal. These methods honor their freedom. That’s a multipolar world we can work with.

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Our Allies should rightly be concerned. The US has become more and more isolationist. The last major free trade treaty was under the TPP under Obama and both Hillary and Trump stated they would not support its passing.

    The US is now energy independent and a net exporter. The US is also in the middle of the largest industrial build out in history which will bring much of our industrial plant back to North America.

    In ten or fifteen years there will be no need for the US to get involved and keep sea lanes open like we are in the Red Sea. We can maintain a presence in the few areas that we deem critical.

    My two sons will be of military age soon I would not support active involvement in any war that would risk their lives for Europe, Middle Eastern or other far flung countries when there is no real threat to mainland US. Supply military and financial aid, sure, but no boots on the ground. We don’t need to fight other peoples wars for them.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      TPP was a horrible treaty. The entire process was basically Hollywood and a few other corporate entities writing out their dream laws that were too horrible to actually pass any legislative body. But once it was in a treaty, they could hound Congress to pass said laws to “meet international obligations”.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        TPP was horrible, many, many give aways to the entertainment and medical industries. But my point still stands, there have been no regional free trade agreements attempted since TPP.

        We’ve only negotiated bi lateral agreements with individual governments on narrow issues.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ironically, it was a horrible treaty for everyone except the US. Trump nixing it was yet another own-goal. After the US pulled out, the remaining signatories reworked the TPP into the CPTPP by removing those “dream laws” and passing the rest of it without the US.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Supply military and financial aid, sure, but no boots on the ground.

      The US is failing to do even that minimal level of assistance in this case. No American troops are helping Ukraine fight, it’s all been training and supplies. That’s all that’s been requested by them. And that’s what the Republicans are blocking.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yep, those are extreme isolationists/Putin stooges.

        This used to be the militant wing of the Republican Party. Just more evidence that the US doesn’t want to get involved in foreign military adventures after 20years in the desert.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      My two sons will be of military age soon I would not support active involvement in any war that would risk their lives for Europe, Middle Eastern or other far flung countries when there is no real threat to mainland US.

      What the fuck…

      Like, I get it. I’m from a red state, my public education is not the best.

      But where did you grow up that they didn’t even cover WW2 in school?

      We ignore countries invading other countries, and we lose our allies while countries like Russia grow stronger.

      They’ll never stop. Even if Russia “restored the USSR” they’re not going to just sit back and relax once that happens.

      “Sparing” your two sons from a war that’s not going to even have a draft is dooming your grandchildren to living thru ww3 where there will be a draft again and even civilian survivors will (if incredibly lucky and wealthy)live through nuclear Armageddon.

      Proxy wars are the only way we’ve avoided more nuclear bombs, and if one side stops fighting the other is just going to speed up.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you want to send your sons and/or enlist yourself to fight in other countries conflicts be my guest. Ukraine is taking foreign fighters you could sign up and serve to protect your global order tomorrow.

        Russia has proven incompetent at modern warfare. The Europeans can figure out how to defend against them on their own.

        Once we have reshored our industrial base in a decade there is no reason to support the global order as it stands. Let Europe or China try and maintain the sea ways and keep peace in areas like Africa and the Middle East if they need those resources so bad. Honestly, it would be better for the worlds environment if they couldn’t continue ravaging the land and burning fossil fuels.

        As stated before I have no problem with providing material support. But I have no interest in involving American troops if there are no direct threats to our homeland.

        • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mate the Russians don’t have to be competent, they just to zerg their way in. Like they are successfully doing now in Ukraine since the Ukrainian army has to put strict quotas on ammo usage.

          I was enlisted around 20 years ago in the middle of Afghan/Iraq madness and was going around American bases to “protect them from terrorists” and I’d happily do it again since it means my family won’t have to be subject of nuclear Armageddon

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The problem is isolationism often leads to situations we can’t ignore, as with the world wars. We were isolationists before then, and we benefited greatly from our international involvement ever since. We are the richest country in the history of the world largely thanks to our geography and international involvement. The dollar is the world’s fiat currency. We prefer not to fight wars for other people, rather we usually just fund and arm groups that share our interests.

      If we withdraw back into our shell, we lose the privileged place we have in the world.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’d argue that the US greatly benefited from isolationism during the world wars, since all the main destruction happened in Europe/Asia.

        This meant that after joining the war late and being in the winning side, they were perfectly poised to inject themselves as a global trade leader. Ironically isolationism brought about the globalist policy today.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yes, being late to the party did benefit the US, but only because we stopped being isolationist.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US is also in the middle of the largest industrial build out in history which will bring much of our industrial plant back to North America.

      What’s this now?

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        See article for details but there is a huge surge in construction of factories and manufacturing in North America.

        Mostly due to decoupling from China, not only because they’ve proven to be terrible economic partners but because their population is imploding.

        We also found that we can automate a lot of manufacturing since Covid. A textile factory used to need hundreds of workers. With modern mills you need maybe a handful to maintain the machinery while it produces almost finished garments. You can now locate your factory near consumers and avoid long transport.

        https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/unpacking-the-boom-in-us-construction-of-manufacturing-facilities

  • deft@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good honestly. The world needs to stop using America as a cure-all solution.

    Weapons are evil, oil is bad, neo liberalism is terrorism and capitalism is slavery. Knock it all off

  • _xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Weird. I was just thinking this earlier whilst out walking. Can the US’ word of friendship/help/support ever be trusted? Has it ever? Soon as it gets a little bit real for the population calls for undisturbed isolation come out and the US reneges on their word.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    With a divided electorate and gridlock in Congress, the next American president could easily become consumed by manifold challenges at home — before even beginning to address flashpoints around the world from Ukraine to the Middle East.

    In campaign speeches, Trump remains skeptical of organizations such as NATO, often lamenting the billions the U.S. spends on the military alliance whose support has been critical to Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion.

    Politics at University College London, said that whoever wins the presidential race, the direction of travel will be the same – toward a multipolar planet in which the United States is no longer “the indisputable world superpower.”

    Germany is the second-largest donor of military aid to Kyiv, behind the U.S., but Scholz recently told Die Zeit that the country couldn’t fill any gap on its own if “the U.S.A. ceased to be a supporter.”

    China, where leaders’ initial warmth toward Trump soured into tit-for-tat tariffs and rising tensions, little changed under Biden, who continued his predecessor’s tough stance toward the United States’ strategic rival.

    Associated Press writers Jiwon Song in Seoul, South Korea, Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin, Dasha Litvinova in Tallinn, Estonia, Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, Nomaan Merchant in Washington, and Jill Colvin and Michelle Price in New York contributed to this story.


    The original article contains 1,206 words, the summary contains 214 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Didn’t anyone tell the rest of the world that as long as Republicans are slightly worse no one is allowed to criticize Biden?!

    Like, how dare they expect us to have any kind of standard than “not named trump”?

    Don’t they know the entire population of America is two geriatric white assholes whose wealth and power have completely separated them from what the average Americans life is like for longer than the average American has been alive!

    /S

  • generalpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    American allies should go worry about building their own economies, infrastructure and militaries so that they stop depending on the US for every single thing that goes wrong and start pulling their own weight.

    Looking at you Europe.