I would say exactly the opposite - it proves the point. The sameness of the two dogs and the lack of the corresponding marriage ceremony in the background rob the image of most of its significance, and the background is a copy that wouldn’t exist if the original hadn’t existed.
This was more of a technical demo than anything else. The real issue I had was that the movie is still under copyright and I had a find a prompt that would allow it to make that much. But I wanted it be as identical to the original as possible to see if it could replicate the soul of the original.
It’s not there I would agree, there is a certain… Flavor missing but it’s very close.
More so I would agree that llms will not be able to ever replicate individual human nuance especially in art.
I really disagree. The lines and content are similar but the soul is completely lacking. This looks like it’s been simplified so much so it could be a coloring book or something. The soul from the plants is totally gone , the coloring of the windows, I look at the generated version and understand completely what I’m looking at, but I feel nothing. P
Yes. Like I said art is extremely subjective, your personal a bias is playing a role. And it is lacking soul absolutely there’s almost a metallic quality to it.
Once again I generated the picture for the sake of comparison. Technically it’s very close to the original. More importantly because it’s an llm it’s missing nuance.
I don’t use it but isn’t that just additional prompts?
“Add a marriage ceremony shadowed in the background.”
“Change the dog on the right.”
I would think the entire style could be built up with enough prompts. It’s no different than digital artists using photoshop and picking a brush that does “watercolor” and then applying a hand paint texture. I have made Photoshops that mimic Van Gogh with a few clicks.
I’m in the camp of if you aren’t actually painting, you have no reason to complain about AI art.
I might very well be. I repair appliances for a living and my AC went out in the car so I’ve been roasting driving from work order to work order my brain is like a roast duck right now.
This is garbage. What are you on about? It is art as an affection. Style as an algorithm. It’s got no sense of balance or intent. It looks like what it is, a copy that doesn’t actually understand what made the original great.
Again art is very subjective. Your own personal bias place role to how much you like or dislike that particular picture however from an absolutely technical standpoint it’s very close to the original not quite there but close.
Just for the sake of comparison. This was made by chatgpt.
Of course art is very subjective but boy did it come close.
Edit: guys. I know you don’t like AI. But if you’re not willing to be objective about the fact that is just a COMPARISON keep your bile to yourself.
I would say exactly the opposite - it proves the point. The sameness of the two dogs and the lack of the corresponding marriage ceremony in the background rob the image of most of its significance, and the background is a copy that wouldn’t exist if the original hadn’t existed.
This was more of a technical demo than anything else. The real issue I had was that the movie is still under copyright and I had a find a prompt that would allow it to make that much. But I wanted it be as identical to the original as possible to see if it could replicate the soul of the original.
It’s not there I would agree, there is a certain… Flavor missing but it’s very close.
More so I would agree that llms will not be able to ever replicate individual human nuance especially in art.
I really disagree. The lines and content are similar but the soul is completely lacking. This looks like it’s been simplified so much so it could be a coloring book or something. The soul from the plants is totally gone , the coloring of the windows, I look at the generated version and understand completely what I’m looking at, but I feel nothing. P
Yes. Like I said art is extremely subjective, your personal a bias is playing a role. And it is lacking soul absolutely there’s almost a metallic quality to it.
Once again I generated the picture for the sake of comparison. Technically it’s very close to the original. More importantly because it’s an llm it’s missing nuance.
I don’t use it but isn’t that just additional prompts?
“Add a marriage ceremony shadowed in the background.”
“Change the dog on the right.”
I would think the entire style could be built up with enough prompts. It’s no different than digital artists using photoshop and picking a brush that does “watercolor” and then applying a hand paint texture. I have made Photoshops that mimic Van Gogh with a few clicks.
I’m in the camp of if you aren’t actually painting, you have no reason to complain about AI art.
When 101 Dalmatians is in the training data, I’m not sure ChatGPT deserves that much credit for its style 😆
Comment removed due to it not being relevant to the comment above.
I don’t recall saying anything about copyright 🤔 . You appear to be trying to have an argument with a different comment 👍
I might very well be. I repair appliances for a living and my AC went out in the car so I’ve been roasting driving from work order to work order my brain is like a roast duck right now.
No worries 😊
That ain’t Perdita! That’s Pongo x 2.
This is garbage. What are you on about? It is art as an affection. Style as an algorithm. It’s got no sense of balance or intent. It looks like what it is, a copy that doesn’t actually understand what made the original great.
Again art is very subjective. Your own personal bias place role to how much you like or dislike that particular picture however from an absolutely technical standpoint it’s very close to the original not quite there but close.
deleted by creator
I mean if you’re not able to put aside your own personal bias and look at the comparison from a purely objective standpoint that’s not my problem.
deleted by creator