• Syl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    I don’t like needles tho (> _ <)… is it really that noticeable of a difference from sublingual?

    • OldEggNewTricks@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      There is also gel, which I found worked fine even for monotherapy. The downside is you have to apply a lot, which is a pain.

      Injections give you a peak and drop-off, which more closely resembles cis natural estrogen production. I don’t know for sure if that is beneficial, but saturation is a thing.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I was told sublingual is one of the worst forms of hrt at this point. Basically shots > pills > sublingual

      Edit: after doing research, it sounds like sublingual is more potent but also less consistent. Now I’m wondering if I can take my pills sublingually or if it requires a different formulation.

      • erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        sublingual has a much higher absorbtion rate than other methods, but also will deplete in your system much quicker, you peak in about 2-4 hours and are back to normal levels within 6-8 hours for most people, so if you want consistent levels with sublingual you need to take it like every 8 hours, or every 12 but 8 is better.

        gels can be inconsistent in measurements, so your dose can vary, but it likely isnt a huge deal, sprays get around this much better.

        injections are cool because i only have to think about it once a week.

      • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        Wait really? I was told the opposite from pills/sublinguals. I’m just a giant baby and really hate needles…