The Ukraine-born winner of the Miss Japan beauty pageant has given up her crown after a tabloid report revealed her affair with a married man.

Karolina Shiino, 26, was crowned Miss Japan two weeks ago but her win sparked public debate due to her heritage.

While some welcomed the naturalised citizen’s crowning, others said she didn’t represent traditional Japanese beauty ideals.

Amid the furore, a local magazine published an expose alleging an affair.

The article in the Shukan Bunshun reported that Ms Shiino had engaged in a relationship with a married influencer and doctor. The man has not provided any public comment.

  • Lath@kbin.social
    131·
    2 years ago

    Because the miss thing is supposed to represent the epitome of Japanese women on the international stage and having an affair is bad PR.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2935·
      2 years ago

      She wasn’t the one having the affair. He was.

      But of course it falls upon women to ensure a husband’s fidelity, because we men are all slobbering troglodytes without a will of our own, only an incessant craving for cunt. Or something.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldEnglish
        94·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, that’s a discussion you won’t win.

        I’ve tried everything from “she’s not the one who promised loyalty” to the fact they were two consenting adults so mind your own business.

        Blame the cheater, not the person who they cheated with, I fully agree - but I think lemmy and reddit have been cheated on a few too many times.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
        4·
        2 years ago

        In Japan, you can be on the hook (sued) for knowingly engaging in a relationship with someone you know to be married. It’s usually about breaking up the marriage, from what I understand. Sex of the people involved doesn’t matter here.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          3·
          2 years ago

          Oh wow, you are right! They have civil liability for adultery. That’s wild.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.caEnglish
        74·
        2 years ago

        An affair still involves two people (or more!) even if only one is married

      • Lath@kbin.social
        33·
        2 years ago

        Politics are always ugly. We should get rid of them altogether.

      • Chee_Koala@lemmy.worldEnglish
        19·
        2 years ago

        It says naturalized, so what else would you call her?

            • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
              311·
              2 years ago

              The fact we are talking about it now, means the context is important to many Japanese people to make a distinction between ethnically japanese and japanese citizen.

              • Chee_Koala@lemmy.worldEnglish
                5·
                2 years ago

                Well in this case there is no distinction, she is Japanese and ethnically she is eastern European/Ukrainian. So… Japanese? It’s cool that you like the distinction, but I responded to someone who said she is technically not japanese, which is technically incorrect. She is, just not ethnically.

                • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
                  17·
                  2 years ago

                  We are in a busy restaurant and I ask you to drop water off to the japanese guest.

                  This might prove difficult in this instance because of the context around the word japanese. I would need to take time to explain the Japanese guest does not look ethnically japanese.

                  For ethnocentric cultures, which Japan (the people) very much is,they would want the context when talking about a Japanese citizen, who is not ethnicity Japanese, like in this article.

                  If japan opens up immigration and more non-ethnic japanese become citizens then it would be less and less important to make the distinction. But that depends on the frequency in the future

                  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    7·
                    2 years ago

                    I agree that leaving out the destinction might cause you to need extra time to explain. This is a consequence of having multiple cultural and ethical backgrounds in your society. Or not, because why does the appearance of skin or face matter, who cares? You could call them dark skin or Caucasian japanese, but that is just a type of Japanese person, a dark skinned, or south American or middle European Japanese person is till just that, japanese. Which is what I said in the first place

                    Ethnocentricity should be about culture, but you applied it to race. Even while immigration services and the state agree: this person is naturalized and thus their nationality is now fully Japanese, you still feel the need to distinguish.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldEnglish
            7·
            2 years ago

            That’s what I like about living here

            • non naturalized citizen? Na, just call them a kiwi too.
      • Lath@kbin.social
        2·
        2 years ago

        Technically, it’s the culture that’s being represented.