The allegations against staffers with the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees prompted Western countries to freeze funds vital for the body, which is a lifeline for desperate Palestinians in Gaza. The U.N. fired nine of the 12 accused workers and condemned “the abhorrent alleged acts” of staff members.
The accusations come after years of tensions between Israel and the agency known as UNRWA over its work in Gaza, where it employs roughly 13,000 people.
Despite the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in the besieged territory — where Israel’s war against Hamas has displaced the vast majority of the population and officials say a quarter of Palestinians are starving — major donors, including the U.S. and Britain, have cut funding. On Monday, Japan and Austria joined them in pausing assistance.
It wouldn’t shock me at all that we find out later that Israel was bs’ing about this and Palestinians starved to death because of it.
So far UNRWA’s track record is on Israel’s side, and for the UNRWA to immediately fire 9 of those accused of collaborating with Hamas means the evidence that was presented to them was exceptionally compelling:
To their merit though, whenever they fucked up they admitted it.
It’s crazy to me that these countries cut funding, even after they fired those people. UNRWA is providing much needed help, from what I’ve heard of the reporting so far, and this disrupts those efforts a lot.
An independent investigation is still ongoing as there are 190 accused, not just 9. Those 9 employees are only those against whom the evidence was compelling enough to prompt an immediate firing by the UNRWA.
190 is ~0.006% of the UNRWA’s 30k staff. Withholding aid from 1.5 million refugees over this is fucking criminal.
https://lemmy.world/comment/7127597
Evidently they count people as refugees even if they resettle elsewhere and get citizenship from another country, and all their descendants as well. If your father was a refugee so are you. Which leads to an interesting situation of people who were never personally displaced claiming refugee status for generations.
So you think a people should just relinquish their claim on their homeland if they haven’t been personally displaced?
How far back is it convenient to go?
I guess it depends, looks like you can go back 2000 years for Jews, but can’t even go less than 100 for Palestinians.
Yes.
Break the cycle.
I think they shouldn’t qualify as refugees if they haven’t been personally displaced, and I hope one day they realize that lives are more important than claims to land their ancestors lived on. The alternative, violence, is what led to them losing this land in the first place, and is why they continue to lose land and freedoms. Choosing violence has consequences.
Definitely don’t let Israel know about your anti-Zionist views, you might lose your job.
deleted by creator
I believe that refers to the 190 workers figure, not the 12 verified participants in October 7th.
Yes. That was in the portion I quoted.
So if the affiliation of the 12 isn’t in question, israel can’t be totally lying about this connection.