Young people in China are becoming more rebellious, questioning their nation’s traditional expectations of career and family

  • Chetzemoka@startrek.websiteEnglish
    554·
    2 years ago

    This is exactly why the billionaires are dismantling the current social media platforms. Organizing is the only threat they truly fear.

    • Spzi@lemm.eeEnglish
      21·
      2 years ago

      As phrased in a recent anti-union campaign by Amazon: Watch out, your co-workers might be “vulnerable to organizing”.

    • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
      319·
      2 years ago

      Can you expand on how billionaires are dismantling social media?

        • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
          218·
          2 years ago

          No. I don’t see how it was “dismantled.” Can you explain?

          • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
            20·
            2 years ago

            Rate limiting and heavily pushed “premium” options have made Twitter near useless for large scale organizing.

            • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
              217·
              2 years ago

              600 posts a day makes it nearly useless for organizing?

              • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
                16·
                2 years ago

                Have you attempted to use the platform since the rate limiting? It’s approximately 2-3 searches before you’re rate limited out of the app for 24+ hours.

                You’re also unable to view comments unless you’re logged in, so you’re required to give them semi-accurate information for an account too.

                It’s literally useless for organizing unless you pay for it, which defeats the entire purpose of wide spread reach like it used to have.

                • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
                  311·
                  2 years ago

                  Okay so twitter is useless. What about all of the other social media sites out there?

                  • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    11·
                    2 years ago

                    None ever had the organizational reach Twitter did. FB/Instagram require more personal data and are much worse for discoverability. Mastodon and BlueSky have the issue of nobody using them (in the grand scheme of things). Lemmy and Reddit don’t work well because of reach and censorship respectively.

                    There still isn’t something out there that replaces the use cases of Twitter.

          • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.worldEnglish
            131·
            2 years ago

            Its capitalist owners rendered it useless for political organization.

            • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
              314·
              2 years ago

              This is just repeating the claim. Can you explain how so?

              • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.worldEnglish
                8·
                2 years ago

                It is wasteful by way of being botted up to the point of inefficiency for individual political communication and its owners are happy to take payments from abusive operators responsible for the bots, if not doing the botting themselves. That’s just Twitter. Other platforms experience similar crapitalist growing pains albeit not all exactly in the same way. For profit motivated entities, there’s always a diminishing ROI on politically actionable systems.

                • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
                  22·
                  2 years ago

                  It is wasteful by way of being botted up to the point of inefficiency

                  Twitter was a bot fest long before Musk took it over. And that isn’t a problem with billionaires, but an inherent problem with system itself that can be, and is, exploited by plenty of people.