• Wanderer@lemm.eeEnglish
    13·
    2 years ago

    It’s very easy to be a contrarian if you just point out issues without understanding the system as almost everything in the world has some form of issues. But it is a lot harder to understand than system and fix it and it’s a lot harder to understand that system well enough and come up with an alternative. You don’t understand capitalism and you don’t understand the alternatives.

    I think you should learn some economic theory. Maybe go out and buy a economics 101 book or watch some YouTube videos.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldEnglish
          22·
          2 years ago

          I did some research and couldn’t discern if the author was a classical economist, or a proponent of Keynesian or neo-Keynesian economics. Regardless, until the “invisible hand” remedies poverty from wealth inequality and homelessness nonexistent; I’ll stick with Marxism.

          • Wanderer@lemm.eeEnglish
            12·
            2 years ago

            Homelessness can be fixed with government spending and capitalist countries has largely fixed homelessness. There always going to be some people that don’t want a home forwhatever reason so never going to be 0 unless you lock certain people in their homes.

            Well yea we will all have equal weather when we have nothing under Marxism. Not sure that’s ideal though.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldEnglish
              21·
              2 years ago

              It is ideal to me. Overconsumption and Climate Change. Something’s going to give. And Mother Nature doesn’t bank at Wells Fargo.

              • Wanderer@lemm.eeEnglish
                12·
                2 years ago

                Communism is inefficient though it leads to more waste. And not to mention most of the biggest ecological disasters have happened under communism.