oce 🐆

Some humans become lactose intolerant as they grow up, not all of them.

He’s worried you’re not respecting the GDPuRr.

It means peach in Japanese.

Tide Punk Goth

It’s not an abduction it’s a catdiac arrest.

I guess they would at least recognize general shape of common words after some time like anyone spending a couple of weeks in a foreign country with a different alphabet would.

Where is Korea worse?

Seems very similar to Japan except South Korea has been gaining popularity in the West more recently.

Could be, or a troll, or a kid that wants to advantage its own comment, so many possibilities!

There seems to be a superstitious person downvoting every single comment.

We’re counting on you now

I prefer pshpshpsh

Damn, I’d be sore after laying flat for months.

Since the 18th century at least.

So the wikipedia page about the history of conservationism is completely wrong? I’m not claiming anything more than what’s on it. Maybe it’s important for your job to read this page.

More straw man arguments, I never called him a conservative.

The conservative position on national parks, at least in the west, would be that they should remain open for resource extraction.

Yes, that’s the point, but also consider that this how it started, before progressive politics made it about nature preservation. Read the Wikipedia page or the quote I have taken have of it if you’re feeling lazy.

You are simply objectively incorrect.

You are simply not trying to understand what I mean because you’d rather confirm the bias you have formed about me when you’ve seen the downvotes on my comments.

Progressive leaders created the national park institutions, but not the concept of conserving natural space, which was initially done to conserve natural resources for human use (sometimes with capitalists reasons or racist reasons), not to preserver nature as we know them today. See the wikipedia page for more details about that.

Let me know what you think I wrote that was objectively incorrect. I get the feeling most people reading this thread and following the downvotes think I’m claiming the USA national parks were solely created by conservative, which I didn’t. I wanted to point at that conservative ideas was what started what later gave birth to national parks as we know them, and not only in the USA. Maybe some national parks locations we know today wouldn’t exist if it hadn’t been protected for conservative reasons initially. Note also, that I used the word maybe, from the beginning, because it’s certainly not the only reason they exist today. I admit guilt to use a short, surprising sentence without further explanation to raise questions, but it seems almost all reactions got negatively oriented from there because of how touchy politics is here, especially if it doesn’t follow the left main stream. This saddens me because with the default ranking system, this interesting thread got buried, and fewer people could read it.

Yeah that’s what is described in the wikipedia article but people here read conservatism, they see red and can’t discuss anymore.