Barbarian human practice for pet population control. I feel so guilty about the ethics

Cloak of invisibility; close, but not too close; present but never seen. At that moment, The Chair (string mousey) PRO hunter’s blind

She is surprisingly compliant.

Cats - The Ballet

I updated the post to reflect the “(cat)” toy nature in the alt text first line. Sorry I took this for granted as a clearly understood context as a common cat toy (in the USA) and failed to describe it as such.

I posted it here because I wanted to reach the most significant audience. Posting this in electrical engineering would have missed the majority of people this is intended to inform.

Not my kcup box nor do I use them. I have reusable kcups and fill them every day with grounds. I can’t fix stupid family; only myself.

Yeah. These are actually lithium rechargeable too. There is a molded housing and built in servo with like 20% range on a small arm that goes in the tail. I haven’t taken one apart but it is triggered off of impact like I would expect from a spring tilt/impact switch, though it could be some kind of MEMS chip.

No clue where they came from. This monster can’t stand them, or anything that makes noise. The kitten loves them, which is awesome if I ever get around to making some cat toys with servo motors again.

What? No.

deleted by creator

Nope

Guns are heavy and slow. Light is near instantaneous and has no trajectory. A targeting laser can move extremely fast and a 360° camera with AI object recognition can pick up targets faster than any human. Targeting does not need to be accurate as a common high power diode laser can fry any optical sensor upon contact. Just aim and add a little jitter in the region of the issue. It should also be possible to use UV lasers that are outside of the visual spectrum. It is not hard to spot these with optics designed for the task, but most military optics seem to focus on IR, so UV should be much less visible while being much higher energy and causing more damage quickly. It should be possible and not require the radio emissions of a jammer.

SDR? It has to be the largest signal in the area right?

Move to 3 points to triangulate quickly when signal is lost to noise and vector to the location regardless of continuous transmission.

I want to know why anti-drone systems are not simply using diode lasers and simple trackers to blind/fry the optics. Seems to me that a system should be about as cheap as the average drone, and they all seem to rely heavily on optical sensors.

Jamming= broad spectrum noise source that is louder at the frequency than the signal of the transponders. In other words, a high power homing beacon that is stationary and always needs to broadcast.

“Oh look! Our drone got jammed.”

“That’s okay. It returns home on its own.”

“Where is home?”

“The jamming beacon.”

Something like that…

deleted by creator