Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoBerlin’s plan for driverless magnetic trains derided by climate groupswww.theguardian.com571759
166Berlin’s plan for driverless magnetic trains derided by climate groupswww.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago57
Show ContentMelonpoly@lemmy.worldEnglish14·2 years agoA driverless Maglev train is already rideable in Japan. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZX9T0kWb4Y&pp=ygURQ2jFq8WNIFNoaW5rYW5zZW4%3D Whether or not it’s worth it is yet to be determined. Driverless trains of lower speeds also already exist. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_driverless_train_systems
Show ContentMirshe@lemmy.worldEnglish64·2 years agoI’m not sold on “driverless”. Even if it’s being monitored 24/7 by some dude in Brussels or whatever, there’s really no substitute for having someone PHYISCALLY on that train, in control, in case of an emergency or something.
Show Contentfaercol@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish10·2 years agoThere’s been driverless subway for decades though, if it’s intracity travel (which seems the case here), then it makes sense. Maglev doesn’t, as many pointed out
Show ContentFarceOfWill@infosec.pubEnglish1·2 years agoSomeone will have to be there still, but they can do more useful things than sit in a box staring at signals
Show ContentQuokka@quokk.auEnglish15·2 years agoI never said they don’t exist. It’s old technology. For the price of a ridiculous project like this how much conventional PT could be built by a workforce that already is equipped for it.
A driverless Maglev train is already rideable in Japan.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZX9T0kWb4Y&pp=ygURQ2jFq8WNIFNoaW5rYW5zZW4%3D
Whether or not it’s worth it is yet to be determined. Driverless trains of lower speeds also already exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_driverless_train_systems
I’m not sold on “driverless”. Even if it’s being monitored 24/7 by some dude in Brussels or whatever, there’s really no substitute for having someone PHYISCALLY on that train, in control, in case of an emergency or something.
There’s been driverless subway for decades though, if it’s intracity travel (which seems the case here), then it makes sense.
Maglev doesn’t, as many pointed out
Someone will have to be there still, but they can do more useful things than sit in a box staring at signals
I never said they don’t exist. It’s old technology.
For the price of a ridiculous project like this how much conventional PT could be built by a workforce that already is equipped for it.