• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    We already had nuclear. This project was building reactors #3 and #4 on a site that already had two, and between that and Plant Hatch, nuclear was apparently already 23% of GA Power’s energy mix even before these new ones came online.

    Frankly, renewables would’ve been superior for energy mix diversity reasons, too. The fact that it would’ve also just been flat-out cheaper for Georgia Power to pay to install solar on my (and everybody else’s) house just adds insult to injury.

    (Okay, that last bit might be hyperbole – I haven’t done the math. But still…!)

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Solar + battery would work for people who have houses but not industry or mid-high rises. The transmission grid doesn’t just function as a means to get energy places but it connects everything in to one system as a means to stabilize everything. So when that electric arc furnace is turned on there isn’t a brownout because the huge demand has been scheduled and generation can be dispatched accordingly. At the distribution grid which is the lower voltage lines connecting homes you can be a lot more creative with microgrid and feed-in-tariffs, in a lot of places these distribution lines are managed by local distribution companies/LDCs which operate separate from the Independent System Operator/ISO which operates the transmission grid and an energy market if there is one.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The project started 10 years ago. Renewables were about to burst open and hit some incredible cost reductions.

      This project looked good at the time.