• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPEnglish
    2·
    4 hours ago

    I will only participate in wars if i am the target of it just as i never throw the first punch. Defensivism?

    … would you like to elaborate how WW2 started.

    • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
      12·
      2 hours ago

      To what reason? The story is replicated a milion times at least by now, you will probably find it and alternative stories all over any major search engine or LLM.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPEnglish
        1·
        2 hours ago

        To what reason? The story is replicated a milion times at least by now, you will probably find it and alternative stories all over any major search engine or LLM.

        … to demonstrate that you understand it, not that LLM sloppers can regurgitate it.

        • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
          1·
          5 seconds ago

          Most large wars do not kick off due to one event, not WW1 or WW2 in a sense were being built up since WW2.

          Not even Hitler is unique for his quick rise to power from dirt poor to top brass over a large population, which many i’ve spoken to earlier have believed.

          I can write multiple A4 about all the various key events that led up to the invasion of Poland.

          Hitler did for sure in my opinion play the primary role in WW2 during the war, but if you study WW2 objectively you will find that not many involved countries have acted noble and another set of actions between WW1 and WW2 could have prevented it, and even rendered Hitler a non-important person historically. However, i agree that it is easy to speculate different outcomes when you know the existing time-line, just like cheating in a game. This might seem to be willingly forgotten by some of the key players today.

          1949, another leader took his seat in a chair and caused massive damages in a region further away from Europe, that is something that should be studied further by European and American citizens.