• CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Off the top of my head, 2. One with no UN seat and one long gone, to be fair, but they still exist and are/were sovereign. You can’t say either turned into totalitarianism.

    Maybe you could say they would have or will, but that’s just your guess. I could say the same thing about liberal democracy and be equally as well supported.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Republican Spain and the “Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria” AKA Rojava.

        Republican Spain had some communist factions too, but Rojava is explicitly built around a specific strain of anarchism, and is an “administration” instead of a government. I doubt it looks very anarchist in practice, but that’s neither here nor there, and they’re democratic enough the US has endorsed them in the past to Turkey’s great displeasure.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Republican Spain was a military faction in a Spanish Civil War, not a country.

          Rojava is Kurdish separatist group, not a country.

          • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Bullshit. They have flags, bureaucracies and a monopoly on the use of force within their territory. I will not argue semantics with you.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              ISIS also has a flag, bureaucracy and a monopoly on the use of force. Doesn’t make them a country. If you don’t have arguments, you should not start arguing in the first place.

              • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Actually, I’d say it made them a country, back before they lost all their territory.

                I’m not sure what the exact term we use has to do with the fate of socialist systems anyway, so I won’t reduce myself to arguing about it. If you don’t have anything else, I think we’re done here.