White House says 'it's the right time' for Israel to scale back Gaza war as fighting hits 100 days
apnews.com
The White House says “it’s the right time” for Israel to scale back its military offensive in the Gaza Strip, even as Israeli leaders vow to intensify their operation against the territory’s ruling Hamas militant group.

The White House said Sunday that “it’s the right time” for Israel to scale back its military offensive in the Gaza Strip, as Israeli leaders again vowed to press ahead with their operation against the territory’s ruling Hamas militant group.

The comments exposed the growing differences between the close allies on the 100th day of the war.

  • idoubledo@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    13·
    10 months ago

    Hamas shouldn’t have governed Gaza, but the other option had to be Fatah and “Israel” had to be a blood thirsty nation for all of it’s existence. Hamas was acting as a charity; making the situation better for Gazans by building hospitals, schools, and mosques. While Fatah was showing off its corruption, and Hamas didn’t even win by that much: Hamas: 44.45% | Fatah: 41.43 %

    Israel left Gaza in 2005, one year later Hamas took over and killed its political opponents, this was followed by an unprovoked daily barrages of missiles towards civilian towns. I don’t know where your claim of Hamas was acting out of charity comes from, and obviously the schools mosques and other charitable activity was all a front for their terrorist activities.

    What do you think should have been the answer to that problem? I think cutting off weapons supply routes is a reasonable course of action. Regarding water, communication and electricity independence - those problems could have been at least partially solved with the billions in aid money that were instead used for terror infrastructure under civilian homes.

    Gaza was supposed to be an example of how a Palestinian state could eventually look like, but they f***ed up, badly.

    “Israel” shouldn’t have existed, and should cease to exist

    “From the river to the sea” style? Your true colors are showing

    All-Palestine. Looks like a call to me

    You didn’t actually read the link you sent, did you? this initiative was a failure, with no real takers from the Arab states. Jordan basically ignored it by annexing the West bank immediately, and Egypt would rather use Gaza to generate more problems for the new Israeli state than confront it directly after the defeat of 1948 (it annexed it later stating its incompetence).

    • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
      11·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know where your claim of Hamas was acting out of charity comes from

      Social services wing

      What do you think should have been the answer to that problem? I think cutting off weapons supply routes is a reasonable course of action.

      I don’t disagree.

      Regarding water, communication and electricity independence - those problems could have been at least partially solved with the billions in aid money that were instead used for terror infrastructure under civilian homes.

      They were used for welfare too, but not everything can be solved with valueless paper notes.

      “From the river to the sea” style? Your true colors are showing

      I never hid my “true colors”, The nation simply shouldn’t have existed. BTW you’re still not addressing your “innocent people of Gaza” comment, and that’s a pretty ugly shade. So you haven’t unlocked the moral high ground yet.