Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoThree armed Palestinians trying to break into settlement killedwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down113
arrow-up141arrow-down1external-linkThree armed Palestinians trying to break into settlement killedwww.reuters.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down16·10 months agoYou can try to justify it anyway you want to. Doesn’t matter to me.
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down4·10 months agoJustify what? Fighting to take their land back from illegal foreign invasion? Why are you ok with the illegal seizure of land that as far as anyone can tell, literally just happened since the IDF was still there? A bunch of foreign soldiers show up and point guns at you so if you don’t die right then it’s their forever? I’m not trying to justify anything. I’m trying (and failing) to understand what you’re going on about. If the original land owners had brought their own military with guns, would that mean they got it back, is that the difference? So anyone with a gun just automatically gains land rights?
You can try to justify it anyway you want to. Doesn’t matter to me.
Justify what?
Fighting to take their land back from illegal foreign invasion?
Why are you ok with the illegal seizure of land that as far as anyone can tell, literally just happened since the IDF was still there?
A bunch of foreign soldiers show up and point guns at you so if you don’t die right then it’s their forever?
I’m not trying to justify anything. I’m trying (and failing) to understand what you’re going on about.
If the original land owners had brought their own military with guns, would that mean they got it back, is that the difference?
So anyone with a gun just automatically gains land rights?