Ukraine plinking a Russian GPS-jammer with a GPS-guided bomb. Ukrainian drones blowing up Russian drone-jammers. Ukraine’s cruise missiles striking Russian air-defense sites whose missions include, you guessed it, shooting down cruise missiles.

Russia’s 23-month wider war on Ukraine has seen a lot of ironic, darkly-hilarious clashes. The latest was also one of the quickest between setup and punchline.

On Tuesday morning, Russian media announced the deployment, to Ukraine, of Russian forces’ latest high-tech counterbattery radar. A few hours later in southern Ukraine, the Ukrainians blew it up … with artillery rockets.

The irony deepens. In theory, a Russian Yastreb-AV radar would help to protect Russian troops from Ukraine’s American-made High-Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems launchers—its HIMARS. Now guess what the Ukrainians used to destroy that first Yastreb-AV.

That’s right: HIMARS.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    10 months ago

    To add to that, this war has shown the importance of shoot-and-scoot. Towed artillery with long setup and teardown times are too vulnerable to drones. Might be the end of an era for towed artillery.

    • Rednax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      The same holds for radar. A radar literally shines a light that anyone looking for it can see. Pinpointing a radar is trivial. Mobile radars can’t stay and detect from a location for very long, without risking an artillery strike. Fast setup and teardown times are crucial, along with a strategy where multiple mobile radars cover for each other, so detection is never offline for long.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Speed is the essence of war, and speed has definitely been the deciding factor. That and logistics. Last I read, Russia was still supplying their military with unpalletized, man-portable crates that take teams of men hours to unload, while Ukraine has their goods loaded onto pallets that take a couple guys with forklifts a couple minutes to get off the trucks and to the people who need them.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      On the other hand the artillery mounted on trucks seems to be quite effective.

      Stuff like the Caesar can park, fire 6 shells and leave in less than 3 minutes.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      What? Ukraine is effectively using towed artillery, Russia isn’t really using anything effectively so there’s an argument for them I guess.

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unlikely - it’s too cheap to get rid of. It will degrade its effectiveness as it’ll need to deploy, fire very few rounds, then leave, unlike traditionally where a battery might fire loads of rounds before moving off.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Reportedly, the Ukrainian reaction to seeing an RCH 155 demonstration was “we’ll take 100”, those things can shoot while scooting. Alas production is going to take a while, Ukraine will be the first user.