PugJesus@kbin.social to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 5 months agoNo mana leftmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1239arrow-down111
arrow-up1228arrow-down1imageNo mana leftmedia.kbin.socialPugJesus@kbin.social to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 5 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareChicoSuave@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·edit-25 months agoWhy, because wizard or because lady?
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 months agoBecause you can’t cast spells while raging, so a barbarian/caster multi-class is usually a bad idea.
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 months agoJust because something is a bad idea, doesn’t mean it doesn’t work for a person at the table. It’s just suboptimal, but that doesn’t mean “bad” unless you are playing with powergamers who will flame you
minus-squareeerongal@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoDepends on your edition. Older editions had a “rage mage” that allowed it.
Why, because wizard or because lady?
Because you can’t cast spells while raging, so a barbarian/caster multi-class is usually a bad idea.
Just because something is a bad idea, doesn’t mean it doesn’t work for a person at the table. It’s just suboptimal, but that doesn’t mean “bad” unless you are playing with powergamers who will flame you
Depends on your edition. Older editions had a “rage mage” that allowed it.