• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think part of the issue the user is describing is the wording of the article, and how it starts by talking about prices of consumer goods in Europe.

    It’s a very complex situation, there are a lot of interconnected factors, and this probably wasn’t the intent of the writer. I assume the article has been through a bunch of edits already

    Still, wording choice and the order of points might make some readers feel a particular way

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      In all honesty, I think the writer was just being bluntly honest about what’s considered an emergency and why in American decision-making circles. If they’d thought a little more, they might have remembered to disguise what they’re talking about a little bit (“international law” “absolutely necessity to protect civilian vessels from harm” something like that), but as it is it was mostly just, welp, we’re losing tons of money now, like enough to impact us, no way in hell can we have that.

      Again, not even saying it’s a bad thing to jump into action when someone’s cutting our trade routes and attacking merchant ships. Just contrasting.