The guy specifically opted out of it. He could have paid the tax but didn’t, and he paid the price for it.

Id call that rural America, yall don’t realize how large some of these places are.

In reality, the person lived outside of the city, and the county doesn’t have its own firefighters. The 75 a month is a little more than what the regular residents paid in taxes to the firefighters. Stupid is as stupid does.

Skaters have always been super inclusive to everyone but scooters. The queer skaters aren’t something new to be gawked at, they’ve always been here.

If the incident was a one off I could see that as true, like the US boat during the six day war when everything was hectic as hell and all communications had seemingly been cutoff. This is unfortunately not an isolated incident, and the benefit if the doubt should not be given.

It’s because they believe it’s funny, and their mainly Israeli audience agrees.

But is it really? All of a sudden every place with unfettered immigration begins to have major economic downturns. Or is it mass immigration has put such a strain on our unprepared systems and infrastructure that our economy suffers in turn.

The US has sent around 14 billion dollars to Israel on top of the 3.8 we send every year. With Israel claiming 15,899 killed and Palestine claiming 22,835, we recieve a dollar to kill ratio of 1.1 million to 779k per palestinian. The US had a 10 million per Iraqi ratio after the conclusion of the Iraq war. Ukraine has recieve 46.3 billion dollars in military aid. With around 100k dead russians we are getting a kill every 463k per Russian ratio.

Did you see how the article did not bring up the country you mentioned? Let’s stay on topic and talk about the other two countries.

Kickass

More like why America needs to blast them back to the past.

Because they want you to pay.

I thought the Hobbit was written by Bilbo as an account of his tales only to be translated at a later date by the narrator. Which explains why place names are in the original language but the rest of the book is in english.

It’s very well established colonial Americans could own the most high end and powerful weapons of the period for their personal use and continued to do so until around the Civil War, this being large cannons. It is also well established the founding fathers understood technology advances and the second amendment should cover any future weapons of war. See private ownership of cannons, privateering, the St. Albans Artillery Regiment, and the Kalthoff repeater for more details.

Your misreading of the second amendment is the main reason you have this viewpoint. When most people think of the second amendment they think of its purposes for hunting, recreational shooting, or self defence against other individuals. However, the purpose of the second amendment is to keep the citizenry armed against the government itself lest we fall under a tyrannical government again. The militia in this case is standard citizens using their own arms against the government in ad hawl units. The founding fathers just fought and won a war against such a government mostly because of their ability to acquire such weapons, and the first thing Britain did when they suspected rebellion was attempt to ban weapons.

In any case, your last point is true. It is just a word in an amendment to the highest document in the land. In which case it takes precedent to all other laws. If you wish to control arms, you need to have an amendment to do it, and until then they shall not be infringed.

That last like sounds faily clear and cut to me. Shall not be infringed.

Killing these laws is a great idea. Shall not be infringed and all.

The Supreme Court is probably waiting for something more impactful. Like a full on challenge instead of just this request that halts the stop date.

Something tells me this is a Detroit thing not a Jew thing.