Admiral Patrick

I’m surprisingly level-headed for being a walking knot of anxiety.

Ask me anything.

I also develop Tesseract UI for Lemmy/Sublinks

  • 1 Post
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle











  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgtoaww@lemmy.worldMy favorite lady
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lol, yep. She was 8 at the time, so I was looking at middle-aged dogs that I thought would be a better fit for her, energy-wise. Nope. She hated them all. So we ended up getting a 4 month old Jack Russell mix which is the opposite of what I thought she’d want. They’ve been besties since.


  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgtoaww@lemmy.worldMy favorite lady
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    They’ll beat the crap out of each other and then curl up like this and take a nap. Brown one is 9, black one is 1.

    Fun fact: The old dog picked the new one. She didn’t like any of the dogs I chose, so I walked her through the shelter until she picked that one. Another fun fact: I did not want a puppy, but Daisy did. So, we got a puppy.





  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgtoWorld News@lemmy.worldNew Year, New Mod Drama
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    We’re working with the admins to come up with a bot to automate it.

    When I was still developing Tesseract UI (RIP), I incorporated MBFC lookups directly in the client and put credibility badges on posts. I didn’t see that MFBC had a public or private API, but they do export a MIT licensed subset of their data in JSON format in their official browser extension. I was able to bundle that dataset into Tesseract to perform lookups locally.

    If the admins want any help with the bot tool and working with the MBFC data, I’m happy to assist.


  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgtoWorld News@lemmy.worldNew Year, New Mod Drama
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I was told to add my voice here, so here’s my take on Rule 3:

    Please keep the MFBC rule. Without that, this sub would be just a repackaged WorldNews@lemmy[dot]ml which is a cesspool where terrible sources and propaganda run crazy. I’ve admin-blocked that community on my instance months ago because of the poor sourcing.

    You can’t “both sides” the truth, and sources that habitually lie, distort the truth, or inject heavy bias should not be given a platform. There are plenty of left-, center, and right-biased sources that are credible, so all angles are possible while maintaining standards for the credibility of submissions. If a particular story is only covered by news outlets that are deemed non credible, there’s probably a reason for that.

    Even allowing case-by-case submissions from non-credible sources (e.g. they just repackage an AP article) is dangerous as it gives the otherwise non-credible source undeserved legitimacy and only serves to muddy the waters for the other stuff they put out. It also sets a precedent: “Well, you allowed this story from Jim Bob’s Reel Truth News so why not this one?”

    Edit: This may be the wrong post? I can’t find the post Little Cow linked to me, but they said it was pinned (lemmy.world/post/10102462).