Th4tGuyII

I was just surprised to see el cheapo in the wild - though for a cheap backpack it’s surprisingly durable, out-lasted some of my nicer packs haha

Sorry to derail, but what a coincidence, I think I might have that very same cross-body bag

“Where we’re going Goat, we don’t need boats - but we do need that cabbage”

FTFY

“Gods, I swear you fix one thing in a ritual, two more take its place - my teleportation no longor puts me in the ground, but now my clothes arrive backwards and occasionally I’m puside down - didn’t even touch those bits of the spell!”

“Gods, I swear you fix one thing in a ritual, two more take it’s place - my teleportation no longer puts me in the ground, but now my clothes arrive backwards and occasionally I’m upside down - didn’t even touch those bits of the spell!”

Was about to say - either that dog is AI generated, or OP has done an awful job taking the picture

Anyone want to take bets on how long it’ll take for this guy to end up falling out of a building or get into a plane crash?

Now taking bets on this man having a tragic accident before next week

The problem is the stereotype of people who say “It’s what my character would have done.” are just using that as an excuse to dodge blame for having their overly edgy character perform questionable acts such as murderhoboing that ruin the fun for everybody else.

Having said that, understanding what your character would actually do in a given situation based on their current knowledge, background, etc. can make for really good RP situations, but must be done in good faith (unlike above)

My DM used to warn their players that if they acted like Murderhobos or were an accomplice to one, they would get treated like Murderhobos…

It also incentivised the party to keep their muderhobos in check, by force if necessary

My old DM’s favourite was the good old “you sure about that?”
Now and again they’d ask it as a bluff, so you never knew for sure if they were serious or not

deleted by creator

I don’t think that’s what they’re saying, I think they’re pointing out that Trump says so much and has so much said about him that what he actually does ends up getting swept under all the other news.

Sure those in the know can keep track but the average person is just seeing the headlines as they come - and this article is part of the very same problem that it is pointing out

The only news we should be reading is about him being behind bars, but unfortunately it seems he’ll die before that ever happens

It’s not that people aren’t paying attention, it’s that the people who have to most power to do anything about it won’t because they’re either in his pocket already, or fearful of stirring up another insurrection

As in you have them roll to see if the goons actually do discuss their plan for the 1000th time or not, or just to see what the juicy gossip is?

In a market that expects infinite growth in a finite reality, I can assure you that I’m not the least bit surprised that companies are using “inflation” as an excuse to gouge their customers for what increasingly little they have