pewter

I’ll blame his/her mistake on the article. Most of the time I don’t have to read the captions of pictures to obtain important information that would have also been in the normal text of the article.

Samuel developed measles aged two in 2014 and recovered, but was admitted to hospital in 2019 after his mother noticed he often lost his balance while walking

Why wasn’t that part in the article proper?

Regulations are a big factor too.

They linked a Wikipedia article for a whole book. We can read the summary section, but presumably it would be better to have read the whole book.

Wouldn’t a comment where they mention what applies in this specific situation make more sense than just a link for a book with a title that’s meant to rile people up?