Take that comment as an example. You’re too stupid to follow the thread, too stupid to realize how stupid you sound, too ignorant to understand the loser is you.

But points for recognizing there is a loser in this thread. Next step is realizing you are them. Next step is keeping your stupid to yourself rather than removing everyone’s doubt.

You project all your emotions on to others.

I have more than 5 bucks. I don’t see anything wrong with being happy that is hurting the wealthy.

The idea that this is hurting the little guy more than the wealthy is clickbait nonsense.

Any sane person has their retirement diversified and uses index funds.

You sound like a wannabe day trader; a temporarily embarrassed millionaire.

Since this is Hama territory, this is a guerrilla war so the invaders need to accept their targets may not always be in uniform.

I can’t help but get the feeling I’m conversing with a real dumb fuck when they get caught up in the example and refuse to acknowledge the premise.

Normally I’m wouldn’t call out dumb-fuckery but your response was overtly aggressive while mine was not.

Unless you’re highly offended by my claim that neither of us are lawyers. I assume I am correct in assessing your status as a lawyer since you manipulated my claim to be against your entire knowledge which is how those weak in logic tend to react.

I am not a lawyer but neither are you. Civil cases can have more than a monetary penalty, they can also have orders requiring or restricting actions.

For example: divorce is a civil matter and can have orders that prevent one of the parties to not to do specific actions such as take the kids and leave the country.

Therefore, it seems entirely reasonable for a civil penalty to result in an order forbidding holding a public office.

“I’m sorry for your loss. Move on.” - Roy - It Crowd

Trump’s just paying homage to his favorite British comedy.