Everything in that title sounds like something from a 90s movie.

Sir Reginald. Reggie for short.

Well of course there’s no bird in this picture. Birds aren’t real!

You have no proof of the claim that this was by design.

You have no way to prevent future idiots from targeting any random thing.

You think articles are going to be the big thing but social media is not. So they are at the behest of whatever is written about them instead of controlling the narrative and that somehow the appropriate route. Going to think group through soup on the Mona Lisa is probably not going to win you a lot of favors. Two years ago a different group of idiots tried the exact same thing. I don’t remember a single positive thing being said about them. And I haven’t seen a single positive thing about this group either. I feel like they’re hurting their message not helping their message.

I foresee these places putting up a replica of the paintings and not the paintings anymore. Because there’s far too much risk.

You can think of a single way to get a message out there outside of this act… Really…

Gosh if there was only a method to communicate with people all across the world… Perhaps social platforms or mediums of which to put forth an idea that could just naturally get shared with everybody else… Terrible shame nothing like that exists.

Saying that the painting wasn’t damaged is very shortsighted. What if these places determine that the risk just isn’t worth it. Sure it’s behind bulletproof Glass but not everything is. I really hate it when people assume that the repercussions for their actions are either immediate or they won’t exist.

You nailed it. I’ve never heard of this group before, but out of principal I don’t support them. You’re a better ways to get attention. This is a kin to a child during a temper tantrum, destroying things to get attention.

Wait… Wait wait wait…

Mr. and Mrs. Dink, from the 90s cartoon ‘Doug’… Was that deliberate or a coincidence!?