• AliasAKA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always understood it to be that things exist to be fruitful and multiply. In a sense, a person who does not love, who doesn’t multiply goodness in the world as Jesus modeled, was like the fig tree. Such things could be thought of as cursed, withered and twisted versions of what they could and should be.

    I am not a Bible scholar though lol.

    • d20bard@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much, only detail missing is that it was the season for fruit. So, there is an added sense that by all natural laws the tree should have had fruit and it’s lack was a particular aberration to a societythat used the fig so much.

      Also, thematically, it rounds out God’s domains. Up to this point, there had been miracles showing dominion over weather, matter, human life, animal life, spirits, disease and now there’s plant life.

      • Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except that the gospel of Mark specifically states that it wasn’t fig season. Why did Jesus even look for the figs when he should have known they were out of season. Why then curse the tree when it was just doing what fig trees are supposed to do? Guess Jesus can be an ass when he’s hangry.