• MacedWindow@lemmy.world
    24·
    2 years ago

    This is from Automata according to google. Looks like I have a new movie to checkout, that robot design is amazing.

  • aname@lemmy.one
    6·
    2 years ago

    Well, he would be right. Humans are just apes.

  • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zipEnglish
    329·
    2 years ago

    Here’s your reminder that robots and ai are not and will never be conscious and are not human and therefore do not deserve the same rights as a living thing

    • Farid@startrek.website
      231·
      2 years ago

      Is this based on some religious beliefs? Because logically, that makes no sense.

      • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zipEnglish
        113·
        2 years ago

        Nope it’s a logical standpoint, consciousness can’t be made synthetically

        • dfc09@lemmy.world
          14·
          2 years ago

          Consciousness can’t be made… Right now. What’s to stop us from doing so eventually?

          I’m sure millennia back people also said “lightning can’t possibly be controlled” and now we use it to make rocks do math so we can shitpost

        • Farid@startrek.website
          13·
          2 years ago

          What’s your basis for this standpoint?
          Nature managed to cobble it together with only random mutations (and non-random selection). Why can’t we imitate it? Eventually, we will likely build a synthetic brain identical to an organic human brain, so it must have the same capabilities.

        • And009@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
          5·
          2 years ago

          Doesn’t sound logical, try looking up synthetic lifeforms. Scientists have already achieved to create biorobots that can divide and replicate.

          It’s similar to early lifeforms. Overtime adding complexity would give us… Decision making and Consciousness ?

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      161·
      2 years ago

      robots and ai are not and will never be conscious

      Bold claim. I’d agree LLMs are not conscious but to say never? Like I said, bold.

      I stronglt recommend reading some Daniel Dennett.

      • JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.world
        7·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, I think there’s a vast difference between what we have now (ChatGPT and whatnot), vs the theoretical possibility of an AGI (artificial general intelligence), or even an AI based entirely off of human neural patterns. Mind you, brain uploading sounds hard, so maybe I’d see a completely synthetic AGI as more likely.

        But if we were ever to develop an AGI, we’d better start giving those things humanesque rights fast.

    • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
      7·
      2 years ago

      Never say never. Ever. You can always be wrong. If you think… nature can do just this with random mutations. So think of what can be done with a purpose in mind. You could miss the forest thru the trees with that thinking.