• Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    Only D&D fans don’t want to hear “play a game better suited to what you want to do”

    That said, I’d recommend Runequest over WFRP any day of the week, and twice on weekends

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    Grognards are people that play old war gaming systems and complain about new things.

    They’re exactly the sort of person that wants to hear “play Warhammer Fantasy.”

  • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Haha, Mörk Borg go brrrr

    Edit: any system that’s described as “a pitch-black, apocalyptic TTRPG” and uses “scum” in place of “player characters” is ok by me.

    FFS, the official tagline is “a doom metal album of a game. A spiked flail to the face. Light on rules, heavy on everything else;” what more do you fellow grimdank dorks want?

  • Atlas48@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    Changeling: the Dreaming fan here. Our system is better suited to the roleplay side of things, several sessions can go by without a single combat, and it’s not the core focus of the system.

  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    I love my WFRP campaign. I’m playing a noble’s servant who got sent on a dangerous quest by his lord to “man him up a little,” and he wound up getting mixed up with a party is complete nutcase. The rules have an odd kind of crunch to them - there’s tons of details for combat, but my GM says there’s basically no encounter design guidelines, for example. Still, it’s a great time and I can’t recommend it enough.